80M Vertical = 70 khz Bandwidth

The Elecraft KAT-500 can handle pretty high SWR for most of the ham bands, but I noticed that on 80M especially, and when the power is higher than about 300 watts, things get a little “touchy”. With the KPA-500 in line, I have had a constant battle of amp faults – and I have tried all kinds of antenna matching circuits – in the shack and at the base of the antenna. I think the real issue was – I was trying to use the antenna in the 80M CW band and also at 3.857.5 for The Mission Trail Net. If I only could choose one, I would take 80M, and since at 1.8:1 or less (I don’t like higher SWR because of the amp situation), I’d just cut the antenna for 3.15 mhz and be done with it. In fact, right now, I could just shorten the antenna by at most a foot and I’d be done. At 100 watts up at 3.857.5, the KAT-500 is fine, and the net notices how much better this 60′ antenna is over the old Inverted L where I had to switch in an LC circuit so it could work on 160M and 80M. In fact, on 160M – the “real” was ALWAYS CW for me – SSB was a non starter. Something to think about.

The antenna as it is right now – is resonant in the 80, 30, 17 and 12M bands. This really is a great thing, especially because I am getting 30M out of this deal. A while back, Tom, N6BT told me that my radial field is good with a vertical when the bandwidth is narrow – that a wide bandwidth means there is a problem with the radial field. So – the antenna and radial field are good – I just need to “behave” in my use of it.

I need to do some serious A – B testing between the UrbanBeam and this 60′ vertical on 30M – that will be fun. There is always some kind of fun little antenna experiment going on here at KY6R! I guess its true – its always been about the antenna – WAY more than DXCC – although DXCC is a great “leveler” – a thing to give you structure and drive – a goal and a purpose to guide one through this antenna “adventure”. An Antenna-Spedition? Antenna-Palooza?

I started building the switchable 80 / 75M circuit, but I’m wondering if I had a direct and a linear loaded loop at the base if the RF would follow one or the other path depending on frequency that I am on. I bet the answer is no – that it will always find the shortest path – which would be 75M. The difference in wire length is several feet – up to 7 in fact.

I checked with Bob at Balun Designs and he recommends his 1:1 Current Choke (I have one) plus my idea to switch in different stubs. He thinks my amp faults are due to common mode at high power.

That makes total sense.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: